Quote
Quote
Really? I thought it made more sense like this.
What if the lost exp was much less than what happens when you win?
EDIT:
Should attacking be a risk free environment?
I LOVE this update Cyber. This is how it should have been from the beginning. When there's a war, whether you're the attacker or the attacky, you will get hurt if you lose.
It's more realistic this way!
Quote
Quote
Quote
Really? I thought it made more sense like this.
What if the lost exp was much less than what happens when you win?
EDIT:
Should attacking be a risk free environment?
I LOVE this update Cyber. This is how it should have been from the beginning. When there's a war, whether you're the attacker or the attacky, you will get hurt if you lose.
It's more realistic this way!
Yes, I think most people thought it worked like that already
Hell, I know I did. It was only after a conversation of jack danialz did I realise
Invisible War FTW