I don't want this to be taken the wrong way but is it ethical to have the 3 admins all on Ultimate Preferred Player? It's only myself doing 1k attacks today that stopped the 3 site admins being 1st, 2nd & 3rd in daily growth and as it stands at time of writing, they're 2nd, 3rd & 4th daily and 4th, 7th & 8th respectively in monthly growth with 2 members having not logged in for a week.
I'm not trying to rock the boat but it does seem to devalue the effort of other members who try to do some daily attacks. I can't imagine it sets a good standard for new players either when they see the stats.
I personally think that it's fine. I can't really imagine CK being a level 50 noob who only gained exp via raiding. It makes more sense for him to be a middle of the pack level. However right now because of the inactivity of the game it's way more noticeable; As well as placing him and other admins higher up the totem pole of power.
I think admins/mods who aren't active should have their VIP privileges removed. New admins/mods should be selected to replace those who no longer contribute to the game.
Quote from Maddox
I think admins/mods who aren't active should have their VIP privileges removed. New admins/mods should be selected to replace those who no longer contribute to the game.
So you want no mods? 
Quote from Captain Raymond Holt
Quote from Maddox
I think admins/mods who aren't active should have their VIP privileges removed. New admins/mods should be selected to replace those who no longer contribute to the game.
So you want no mods?
I vote Symphony for moderator.
Realistically though, no one is contributing to the game atm.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edited by Symphony @